Download PDF

The Daily Prophet is bound to report the truth occasionally, if only accidentally.

Headmaster Albus Dumbledore,
in Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince

During times of great upheaval—election fraud, militarism, “terror” attacks, corporate corruption, and war—it is sometimes useful to take refuge in the wisdom of stories told to us as children. In J. K. Rowling’s wildly popular Harry Potter series, for example, the Daily Prophet (the wizarding world’s newspaper of record) often serves as little more than a mouthpiece for the Establishment, stenographically serving up “news” that reflects the “spin” of the Ministry of Magic, while chipping away at the reputations of those who challenge the Ministry’s power. Helped along by mentors such as Dumbledore, Harry and his young school­mates, wizards-in-training all, begin to realize that much of what passes for official “news” in the Daily Prophet is nothing more than carefully constructed public-relations propaganda designed to manipulate wizard hearts and minds.

Popular children’s stories like Harry Potter often reveal much about the way the real world works. Remember the classic about the Emperor’s New Clothes? Once upon a time, a rich and powerful emperor ordered snazzy new garments from a tailor with a sense of humor, an outfit consisting of nothing more than his birthday suit. The Emperor proved so taken with his new threads that he refused to acknowledge that he was sans clothing, parading about for the entire world to see. All of his loyal subjects, busy bowing and scraping, couldn’t bring themselves to tell him the truth. The Emperor was naked. One person in the crowd—a lone child—refuses to wallow in this exercise in collective denial, decid­ing not to play along with the game. And that one child began telling others, who told others, who pointed it out to others, and soon—the story got out. The Emperor was naked. In a healthy and functioning democratic society, journalists must play the role of the child in that well-known fable. It is journalists who ask hard questions of the power­ful. It is journalists who provide a rigorous accounting of the evidence as it presents itself. It is journalists who report truths about the way the world works, no matter how inconvenient or troubling. The empire is naked.

As the United States enters the twenty-first century, however, its third century as a so-called constitutional republic, most mainstream American journalists, out of fear, ignorance, or denial, refuse to acknowledge a simple fact about our great country: the empire is naked. The state of our “news” culture (and I use the term loosely) is deeply troubling. The United States is now the most powerful empire in the world. And, as citizens of the most powerful empire in world history, Americans had better know what the heck is going on. But when it comes to “news,” Americans live in one of the most heavily censored societies in the world. “Censorship” in the United States, you say? Preposterous. (Note: we are conditioned from birth to believe exactly the opposite). Choices, we are told, define our media culture, unlike those oppressive top-down state-run regimes—Cuba, say, or the pre-glasnost Soviet Union—in which state-controlled media tell people what to think. We’ve got dozens of television stations, hundreds of magazines, thousands of radio stations, millions of web sites. Censorship? Don’t be absurd.

Pay no attention to the fact that most Americans surveyed claim to get all of their news and information about the world from television. Or that we see, on average, more than 3,000 advertisements each day. Or that 90 percent of our media content is owned by one of six trans­national corporations. Or that millions of taxpayer dollars are funneled into dozens of federal agencies for the express purpose of subsidizing the manufacture of corporate-friendly “news” in the form of video news releases broadcast daily on millions of American TV sets without being identified as such. Or that big business spends more than 1 trillion dollars each year on powerful advertising, marketing, and branding campaigns that influence the ways we think, feel, buy, and behave. Just ignore such inconvenient facts. The empire is naked.

January 14, 2006

(Un)Covering the Empire

During times of great upheaval—election fraud, militarism, “terror” attacks, corporate corruption, and war—it is sometimes useful to take refuge in the wisdom of stories told to us as children. In J. K. Rowling’s wildly popular Harry Potter series, for example, the Daily Prophet (the wizarding world’s newspaper of record) often serves as little more than a mouthpiece for the Establishment, stenographically serving up “news” that reflects the “spin” of the Ministry of Magic, while chipping away at the reputations of those who challenge the Ministry’s power.
January 11, 2006

Our Land, Our Destiny: Vermont Independence Convention Keynote Address

When we think about the destiny of our land, there are a few questions we might ask: What do we mean by “our land?” What has been holding it together? Who are we? And who will we become?
April 25, 2005

The Second Vermont Republic: Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Second Vermont Republic? The Second Vermont Republic (SVR) is a peaceful, democratic, grass­roots, libertarian populist movement opposed to the tyranny of the U.S. Government, corporate America, and globalization and committed to the return of Vermont to its rightful status as an independent republic, as it was between 1777 and 1791.
April 25, 2005

War and the Second Vermont Republic

Here’s an easy question to invite you into my meanderings: How many times did the first Vermont Republic begin a war? None? Bingo. Okay, there are huge differences between the world of the late eighteenth century and the post-9/11 twenty-first-century world. But there are simi­larities as well, and it is time to reexamine the role of U.S. states and their National Guard units in questions of war and peace, with special emphasis on wars of choice—wars that have no credible relationship to national defense.
April 5, 2005

The Collapse of the American Empire

It is quite ironic: only a decade or so after the idea of the United States as an imperial power came to be accepted by both right and left, and people were able to talk openly about an American empire, it is showing multiple signs of its inability to continue. Indeed, it is now possible to contemplate its collapse. The neocons in power in Washington these days, who were delighted to talk about America as the sole empire in the world following the Soviet disintegration, will of course refuse to believe in any such collapse. But I think it behooves us to examine seriously the ways in which the U.S. system is so drastically imperiling itself that it will cause not only the collapse of its worldwide empire but vast changes on the domestic front as well.
April 5, 2005

Voices for Independence

Why this journal, Vermont Commons? And why now? Vermonters, Americans—indeed, all the world—stand at a widening divide. Not between red and blue, right and left, conservative and liberal, capitalist and socialist, and other such worn political coinage. No, we stand at a truly immense divide: that between our past and our future. Behind us, an experiment in democracy whose energies are still robust, but whose framework—the modern nation state—teeters in all its towering immensity. Behind us stand the great achievements of the Modernist era, molded by one of history’s great forces: centralization. Raw measures of power—governmental, military, scientific, economic, monetary, corporate—have reached levels of magnitude inconceivable a mere generation ago.