by Enid Wonnacott
Download PDF

When I heard Michael Ableman, of the Center for Urban Agriculture, speak in Vermont last year, there was one statement he made that I have returned to frequently throughout the year—“pleasure is a better moti­vator for change than guilt.” He continued, “How do we provide an invi­tation, rather than a harangue?” It is hard to determine what thing or combination of things motivates social change—this is a question that traverses disciplines, whether studying educational change or political change.

I have been interested in motivations for behavior change through­out my academic and professional careers—most recently, what will motivate kids to make different food choices in school; how can we most effectively impact child-eating behaviors? School food change has gained so much national attention, not because of the pleasure children will experience when they pull their first carrot out of the ground, but because of the increased incidence of type 2 diabetes and obesity. What determines which foods a second grader will choose when he or she gets to the end of the lunch line? Most likely, it will not be the school nurse’s voice or their parent’s voice or the memory of something they read; more likely, their decision will be influenced by the experience they have had with that food. Did they help plant those cabbage seedlings in their school garden, did they visit the farm and help harvest those potatoes, did they prepare a taste test for their peers in their classroom?

The Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont (NOFA-VT) has worked with Food Works and Shelburne Farms for over ten years on a collaborative project called Vermont Food Education Every Day (VT FEED). A focus of the project is to change the palettes of Vermont youth, so that when they get to the lunch line, they can choose food from farms in their community and they will choose those foods. It has always seemed commonsensical that if a school is within walking distance to a farm in their community, as many are in rural Vermont, then those schools should have a food purchasing relationship with those farms or at least other Vermont farms. Due in part to VT FEED’s work, and to communities who were working on these efforts before VT FEED came along, there are now 75 schools out of Vermont’s 300 public schools that are integrating the math, history, and science of local farms into their curriculum and purchasing local food for their lunch line.

I love that I can eat lunch at the Brewster Pierce Elementary School in Huntington that has been prepared with the vegetables harvested by the students from a neighboring farm, that the farmer has songs writ­ten about her by the students as part of an artist-in-residence program and that when farmer Sarah Jane comes to lunch she receives a standing ovation. I was, again, reminded of Michael Ableman when he said “I’ve seen chefs who prepare local foods receive mythical rock and roll status, it’s time for farmers to receive the same.” When adults think about their food choices, what is motivating them? What are the messages that influence those purchasing decisions? Consumer surveys say that “fresh­ness” and “taste” are the predominant motivators, but factors such as the perceived health benefits, contribution to the local economy, and price are also influential. I think our greatest challenge and greatest strategy to influence food choices, as we have learned through our work with schools, is for individuals to experience food through growing, harvest­ing, preparing, or developing a relationship with that food and food producer.

The organization leading the crusade toward a new food culture nationally is Slow Food, “a non-profit, eco-gastronomic member-supported organization that was founded in 1989 to counteract fast food and fast life, the disappearance of local food traditions and people’s dwin­dling interest in the food they eat, where it comes from, how it tastes and how our food choices affect the rest of the world.” I was fortunate to attend Slow Food’s Terra Madre in Turin, Italy, last fall. Accompanying the event was a celebration of regional foods called the Salone del Gusto where small-scale food producers come from all over the world to show­case their products, and the event is dedicated both to excellent food and to the extraordinary people who produce it. At the Salone, I tasted the wines from the Piedmont Valley and the prosciutto from Sienna (not to mention the molten chocolate . . . ). All of these foods have a history and a story. A focus of the Slow Food event was to celebrate food traditions, to recognize foods unique to a region, and to create a connection to a place through the foods of that place.

One of the speakers at Terra Madre was Davia Nelson, a National Public Radio correspondent working on a program called “Hidden Kitchens,” a series that explores how communities come together through food. Davia spoke about her experience visiting and chroni­cling all kinds of American kitchen cultures. She said that “America is in need of a movement—there was a peace movement and an envi­ronmental movement and now we are in need of a food movement.” Similar arguments have been made during the current Farm Bill debates. Michael Pollan recently wrote that most Americans are not engaged in the process of creating the Farm Bill, that many people don’t know a farmer nor care about agriculture—but we all eat. He recom­mended that “this time around, let’s call it the food bill.”

Of course Vermont is different, in that most Vermonters know farm­ers, and most Vermonters care about agriculture, but it begs the ques­tion, “How would our agricultural system be different if our country created a Food Bill or a Farm and Food Bill every five years?” As with other massive pieces of legislation, it is hard to get individuals engaged in the process of commenting on sections of the bill, calling their congres­sional representatives, or understanding the finer details. Having conversations with my peers about the Farm Bill reminds me of trying to engage individuals in the finer points of NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement)—these are omnibus works that are hard to expe­rience by individuals. NOFA-VT decided to go to where the people are this summer and have discussions about some of the details of the Farm Bill—we have tabled at places such as Hunger Mountain Coop and the Addison County Field Days. But, of course, the Farm Bill is not just about farms, it is about programs that impact farmers and reauthorization for nutrition programs that reach many Vermonters. And in our goals of influencing the food choices of children and adults in Vermont, we have to consider all of Vermont, and make sure that all Vermonters, including those with limited income, have access to fresh, local food.

It just makes common sense to circulate food dollars, as much as possible, within our local communities—the project gives terms such as “community economic development” and “relationship marketing” new meaning to me. Farmers’ markets provide an opportunity for food consumers to purchase food directly from the person who grew that food—every individual who visits a farmers’ market is engaging in a pleasurable food experience. That is what brings us back to a farmers’ market or motivates us to renew our share in a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) farm, or plant our own garden to nourish our family—we are predominantly motivated by pleasure. And because Vermont has more farmers’ markets and CSAs, per capita, than any other state in the country, then I guess we can argue that we have the greatest capacity for pleasure!

The energy of the Localvore movement in Vermont confirms that Vermonters at a very grassroots and community level are harnessing our capacity for pleasure using food as a medium. Localvores are individuals committed to eating food within 100 miles of their home. Referred to as the “100 mile diet” in Canada or Locavores in California, they serve as examples of the emergence of a local food movement throughout the country. In Vermont, there are Localvore Pods organizing in communi­ties to challenge and support each other to eat local foods for a day, a week, a month, or throughout the year. These learning communities are operating at a much more complex level than just planning for their meals for the week—in the Mad River Valley (www.vermontlocalvore.org), when a farmer’s barn collapsed this winter due to the snow load, the Localvores held fund-raisers, supplied meals for the family, and orga­nized work crews, and in, Brattleboro, Post Oil Solutions (www.postoilsolutions.org) is organizing a Localvore challenge and engaging the community in issues of climate change and peak oil. The Localvores meet quarterly to analyze Vermont’s food transportation and storage infrastructure, to identify crops that we need in greater supply (grains, beans and oil crops), and to share community-outreach efforts.

Although many regions in the country are having the “local or organic” debate, fueled by high-profile stories challenging the emer­gence of organic food in Walmart and questioning the ethics of consum­ing food that has been transported so far when a consumer could buy those same products more locally, Vermont, fortunately, does not have to spend time on that discussion. The history of the organic movement in Vermont is a story of small farms, developing an infrastructure for local food sales and “food for the people, not for profit.” In Vermont, organic is synonymous with local. Vermont consumers don’t have to debate whether to buy an organic strawberry or a local strawberry, organic wheat or local wheat, organic cheese or local cheese—we can have both. Let’s debate more meaningful topics, such as how do we build a vital food culture in Vermont? How can we support all Vermonters to have positive food experiences that influence their consumption and purchasing decisions? If I were creating an agricultural testament for Vermont, the first principle would be “Know Thy Farmer.”

 

September 14, 2007

The Food Less Traveled

When I heard Michael Ableman, of the Center for Urban Agriculture, speak in Vermont last year, there was one statement he made that I have returned to frequently throughout the year—“pleasure is a better moti­vator for change than guilt.” He continued, “How do we provide an invi­tation, rather than a harangue?” It is hard to determine what thing or combination of things motivates social change—this is a question that traverses disciplines, whether studying educational change or political change.
May 25, 2007

Origins of the New England Secession Tradition

The Vermont independence effort is guided by a peaceful group of thoughtful citizens who believe that Vermont would be better off as a small independent country like Iceland, Lichtenstein, Monaco, Luxembourg, or Switzerland than to remain under the domination of an overly centralized and increasingly out-of-control central federal government. To some, the idea of an independent Vermont is preposter­ous but harmless, more theater than serious policy. To others it smacks of treason. Did not the Civil War settle forever the question of whether a state within the United States can secede? It did not.
May 18, 2007

The Decentralist Movement: A Third Way

Just a few weeks ago I took seven large boxes of books from my library to give to the E. F. Schumacher Library just outside of Great Barrington, Massachusetts—books I’d gathered for years on decentralism, anar­chism, community, separatism, and the like—and I was struck once again by the depth, tenacity, and importance of the movement to which I was contributing. For the Schumacher Society and its library were established to provide an intellectual and activist home for what we can call, loosely, the decentralist movement. This is the Third Way that has existed for a century or so outside the varieties of centralists, both conservative and liberal; a movement that has vigorously put forth cogent alternatives to the modern-capitalist industrial nation-state.
May 9, 2007

The Great Hydropower Heist: How Corporations Colonized Our Watershed Commons

From Vermont’s founding as a Republic in 1777 until the early 1900s, its citizens were far more energy independent than we find ourselves now. The old-timers traveled and transported goods with an efficient blend of the original horse power and coal-fired steam trains. They heated largely with wood and built hundreds of small hydropower facilities—initially, mechanized mills that utilized raw waterwheel power and were later retrofitted with electric generators and complementary coal-fired steam-powered systems. Hence, the claim: “Hydro—the power that built Vermont.” Now Vermonters spend roughly $2 billion every year on out-of-state fuels for transportation, heating, industrial applications, and electricity. More than $1 billion pays for imported oil and gas alone.
September 9, 2006

Local Currency: A Revolution That Sounds Like a Whisper

When the French and Russian revolutions overthrew the estab­lished orders in their countries (in 1786 and 1917, respectively), they changed just about everything, but not their monetary systems. — Bernard A. Lietaer, Of Human Wealth
September 9, 2006

Money and Liberty

The U.S. monetary system has been a scandal for a long time; whether it can continue much longer without intolerable social, political, and ecological consequences is an open question. Yet most Americans don’t have a clue about it. “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system,” Henry Ford said, “for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”
April 9, 2006

Powering Vermont’s Future by Embracing the Peak-Oil Challenge

Oil. We’re using it up like there’s no tomorrow. But there is. Why is it, then, that nobody wants to talk about peak oil? We’re will­ing to discuss climate change; even send a tripartisan proposal to the governor in an attempt to move Vermont toward a less fossil-fuel driven energy portfolio. But the “P” word hardly ever gets any press. At what cost, this silence?
April 5, 2006

Liberals and Conservatives: Relics of the Past

When former Democratic vice presidential candidate John Edwards and Illinois Democratic Senator Barack Obama recently spoke to packed houses in Burlington, they provided glaring evidence that there is “noth­ing new under the sun” in mainstream U.S. two-party politics. Both delivered speeches laced with pseudo-liberal blather, Obama delivering a “call to action” similar to Howard Dean’s 2004 “Take Back America” campaign. As Edwards and Obama recited one liberal Democratic cliché after another, a discerning listener couldn’t help but be struck by how completely irrelevant the terms “liberal” and “conservative” have become in today’s twenty-first-century world. Those who openly iden­tify themselves with either of the terms are anachronistic and out of touch with reality.
February 25, 2006

Economics of Scale vs. the Scale of Economics: Toward Basic Principles of a Bioregional Economy

Economics of scale is what conventional industrial economies are all about, finding ways to more profitably and efficiently exploit nature. But the scale of economics is what the economies of the future must be about, finding ways to live so that healthy communities may foster a healthy earth. There are only two essentials to consider in coming at the problem of the optimum scale for an economy to produce and distribute goods and services: the natural ecosystem and the human community.
February 22, 2006

From Common Wealth to Common Property

We all know what private wealth is, even if we don’t own much. It’s property we inherit or accumulate individually, including our fractional claims on corporations and mutual funds. When President Bush speaks of an “Ownership Society,” it’s this kind of wealth he has in mind. But there’s another trove of wealth that’s not so well known: our common wealth. Each of us is the joint recipient of a vast inheritance. This shared inheritance includes air and water, habitats and ecosystems, languages and cultures, science and technologies, social and political systems, and quite a bit more. Though the value of these manifold gifts is hard to calculate, it’s safe to say they’re worth trillions of dollars. Indeed, accord­ing to Friends of the Commons, their aggregate value probably exceeds that of everything we own privately.
February 17, 2006

The Real Economy

Stories about the economy typically focus on Gross Domestic Product (GDP), jobs, stock prices, interest rates, retail sales, consumer confi­dence, housing starts, taxes, and assorted other indicators. We hear things like “GDP grew at a 3 percent rate in the fourth quarter, indicat­ing a recovering, healthy economy, but with room for further improve­ment.” Or, “The Fed raised short-term interest rates again to head off inflation.” But do these reports, and the indicators they cite, really tell us how the economy is doing? What is the economy, anyway? And what is this economy for?
February 9, 2006

Local Living Economies: The New Movement for Responsible Business

A socially, environmentally, and financially sustainable global economy must be composed of sustainable local economies. Yet, tragically, from American “Main Streets” to villages in developing countries, corpo­rate globalization is causing the decline of local communities, family businesses, family farms, and natural habitats. Wealth and power are consolidating in growing transnational corporations that wield alarm­ing control over many important aspects of our lives—the food we eat, the clothes we wear, the news we hear, and even the government we rely on to protect the common good.