WINOOSKI – The Winooski City Council unanimously approved spending $5,000 more on a lawsuit the city entered last year regarding the U.S. Air Force’s environmental impact statement regarding F-35 fighter jets.

The additional money was an agenda item at Monday’s council meeting at Winooski City Hall.

The City Council initially approved spending $7,500 on the lawsuit when the city decided to enter the case in April 2015. The council said at the time that if additional money were needed, a motion would come back before the council for public discussion and a vote.

The city joined the Stop the F-35 Coalition and six Chittenden County residents as plaintiffs in the lawsuit against U.S. Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James. Four of the individual plaintiffs are residents of Winooski.

​Plaintiffs who filed the case in federal  court say the Air Force failed to provide enough information in the report released in April 2014. At issue is whether the Air Force underestimated the level of noise and the potential impact on health, property values and safety for those in the flight locations.

The plaintiffs, including the city, all have filed motions in U.S. District Court in Vermont for a judgement in the plaintiffs’ favor without a jury trial. U.S. government lawyers have opposed the motion and instead are asking the judge to rule in the defense’s favor. A hearing  is scheduled for July 5.

Winooski Mayor Seth Leonard said during the Monday meeting that the city had used all of the $7,500 and was considering the additional money to cover legal fees. He said the city had consulted with its independent lawyer, who thought $5,000 would be an appropriate amount to continue with the case.

“There’s a minimum we could spend to be a responsible participant,” Leonard said before the council meeting, adding that the money would cover the city’s ability to respond to additional filings in the case, prepare for the July 5 hearing and attend the proceeding in U.S. District Court in Rutland.

“I think we need to move in a direction that allows us to complete the process we started,” Councilor Brian Corrigan said. Corrigan was the only councilor to make a comment on the agenda item at Monday’s meeting.

The first resolution asked for:

  • A formal review by the Air Force of the noise impacts of the F-35s on Winooski.
  • An explanation of why the Vermont Air National Guard base at Burlington International Airport is considered the preferred location for basing the fighter jets.
  • Operating procedures for the F-35s in mitigating the impact of increased noise on Winooski.

The second resolution included a request by the Winooski City Council that the Burlington Air Guard Station be removed from consideration for F-35 basing.

This story was first posted online on March 28, 2016. Contact Elizabeth Murray at 651-4835 or emurray@freepressmedia.com. Follow her on Twitter at www.twitter.com/LizMurraySMC.

April 7, 2016

Pentagon Pork Pushback: Vermont’s Winooski City Council Continues F-35 Legal Fight

An early version of the F-35 takes off from Fort Worth, Texas. (Photo: COURTESY)  WINOOSKI – The Winooski City Council unanimously approved spending $5,000 more on a lawsuit the city […]
April 7, 2016

Bernie Sanders’ “Pie In The Sky” Platform? Nonsense.

Does Bernie Sanders’s economic program amount to pie-in-the-sky nonsense? The short answer is no. All of his major proposals are grounded in solid economic reasoning and […]
April 6, 2016

Dam It, Vermont! Should We Buy TransCanada’s 13 Hydro Dams?

Gov. Peter Shumlin speaks, flanked by (l-r) House Speaker Shap Smith, Senate President Pro Tem John Campbell and Secretary of Administration Justin Johnson. Gov. Peter Shumlin […]
April 4, 2016

What The Frack, Vermont? Rising Tide VT Continues Stalwart Pipeline Opposition

BURLINGTON – Anna Rose of Rising Tide VT is perched on a table next to an LCD projector in the meeting space of the Vermont Workers’ […]
April 4, 2016

We Speak For The Bees! Vermont Hives Up To Address Global Honeybee Crisis

  On Vermont’s Route 7 running north to south, travelers pass farm fields of alfalfa, cows, a single camel (true!), and thousands of bees. Vermont is […]
March 28, 2016

Psyching Out Climate Change: “Grounding Hope” for Vermont’s Future

Almost all of what we hear in the news today, in relation to the environment, tends to be on the topic of the anthropogenic degradation of […]
March 28, 2016

Cannabis Regulation for Vermont: TEN Good Reasons

2VR has been working on Vermont cannabis regulation for more than a year, in conversation with a wide variety of Vermont stake holding groups. Summarizing one […]
March 24, 2016

Greening Vermont, Building a More Resilient Future

Here in Vermont, as everywhere, the built environment has a vast impact on the natural environment, human health, and the economy. 40% of our energy consumption […]
March 19, 2016

Are Vermonters Suffering From Our “Normalcy Bias”?

A friend of mine says a lot of Vermonters are about to get a rude awakening over the next couple of weeks as the traditional sugaring […]
March 18, 2016

Tree Base’ing: Vermont’s Logging Industry – Past, Present and Future

Publisher’s Note: As 21st century fossil fuel energy resources dwindle in the Age of Peak Oil, Vermont will become more reliant once again on its forests, […]
March 8, 2016

Beyond Prohibition: Why Consider Cannabis Regulation for Vermont?

As the House considers a bill that would end the prohibition of cannabis for adults, I am keeping an open mind. Prohibition has been ineffective and […]
February 13, 2016

Cheap Oil and Imminent Collapse: Connecting the Dots

The signs of oil’s madcap price collapse are everywhere. Global markets now behave like digital roller-coasters from China to Europe. Schlumberger, the largest oil field service firm, cut 10,000 jobs in 2016 and another 20,000 jobs last year. The champion of hydraulic fracturing posted a loss of $1 billion, too.