Publisher’s note: We have covered the “vaccine question” in Vermont for years here, including pointing out what the pharmaceutical corporations themselves say about these misnamed COVID-19 “vaccines” – in reality, they are, as Big Pharma states quite clearly, more like “operating systems” – experimental, emergency, untrialed, mRNA-targeted, cell reprogramming gene therapy technologies. Thanks to Vermonter Jim Hogue for sending over this meditation putting the question of whether to “vaccinate” or not into sharper view. He ends by pointing out that he is not anti-‘vaccine,’ he is pro-informed consent and health freedom. We’d agree. And here’s a provocative meditation on the V and Health Freedom from Hamburger Stand., an eye-opening meditation from Unz on the “Unvaccinated” as “Outcasts,” CJ Hopkins on March 30 on “The Unvaccinated Question” (brilliant), and Off Guardian featuring a US Human Rights lawyer on the “COVID Vaccine Nonsense.”

Free Vermont, and free Team Human!

Please support Vermont Independent’s work through our Patreon page.

PS – Watching Big Pharma-funded outlets like the New Yorker and The Atlantic work overtime to question the majority of Americans exhibiting “vaccine hesitancy” (Orwell is chuckling) would be hilarious if it weren’t so sinister. Case in point. And again.

●”If I get “vaccinated,” can I stop wearing a mask(s)?”
Government: “NO.”

●”If I get “vaccinated,” will Vermont restaurants, bars, schools, fitness clubs, hair salons, etc. reopen, and will Vermonters be able to get back to work like normal?
Government: “NO.”

●”If I get “vaccinated,” will I be resistant to COVID?”
Government: “Maybe. We don’t know exactly, but probably not.”

●”If I get “vaccinated,” at least I won’t be contagious to others – right?”
Government: “NO. The vaccine doesn’t stop transmission.”

●”If I get “vaccinated,” how long will the “vaccine” last?”
Government: “No one knows. All Covid “vaccines” are still in the experimental stage.”

● “If I get “vaccinated,” can I stop social distancing?”
Government: “NO.”

● “If my Vermont parents, grandparents and myself all get “vaccinated,” can we hug each other again?”
Government: “NO.”

● “So what’s the benefit of getting “vaccinated?”
Government: “Hoping that the virus won’t kill you.”

●”Are you sure the “vaccine” won’t injure or kill me?”
Government: “NO.”

●”If statistically the virus won’t kill me (WHO stated 99.7% survival rate), why should I get “vaccinated?”
Government: “To protect others.”

●”So if I get “vaccinated,” I can protect 100% of people I come in contact with?”
Government: “NO.”

● “If I experience a severe adverse reaction, long-term effects (still unknown), or die from the “vaccine,” will I (or my family) be compensated from the “vaccine” manufacturer or the Government?”
Government: “NO – the government and “vaccine” manufactures have 100% zero liability regarding this experimental drug.”

So to summarize, the Covid19 “vaccine”…

Does not provide immunity.
Does not eliminate the virus.
Does not prevent death.
Does not guarantee you won’t get COVID-19.
Does not stop you from passing it on to others.
Does not eliminate the need for travel bans.
Does not eliminate the need for business closures.
Does not eliminate the need for lockdowns.
Does not eliminate the need for masking.

I am not anti-“vaccine.” I am pro-choice.
Want the “vaccine”? Help yourself.
Just don’t tell me your choice must also be my choice.

And here is new analysis from Josh Mitteldorf, courtesy of New York University professor Mark Crispin Miller:

  My message has been: We know this “vaccine” is a new technology, and we have have every reason to think it has long-term effects on the body’s immune system. In the past, we have gauged those long-term effects before licensing vaccines, even when they are not based on new technologies, and we have found some positive long-term effects and some negative long-term effects. In the case of the COVID vaccines, we have rushed them out to hundreds of millions of people without any idea what the long-term effects are. By any standard of medical practice pre-2020, this would be considered irresponsible, dangerous, some would say criminal. Is COVID19 really such a threat that it justifies massive experimentation with human lives at stake?

    And here’s my new message, which I welcome you to try out: The COVID virus is usually gone from the patient within a few days. What gets people into the hospital and sometimes kills them is called a cytokine storm. The body is overreacting with inflammation so strong that it can be suicidal. This is how people die of COVID. The virus doesn’t kill them directly.

   Fast-forward to the vaccine. Vaccines have the function of prepping the body, ensuring a stronger immune response the next time the pathogen appears. If all goes well, the virus appears, the body is ready for it, and the immune system wipes out the virus quickly, before it can take hold. No further action is needed, and the patient doesn’t become sick. But when things go badly, the virus appears and the body reacts TOO strongly, going quickly into cytokine storm mode. The virus can be MORE deadly to people who have had the vaccine. This is called “pathogenic priming”, and it is not just a theoretical possibility. It happened repeatedly in ferrets during testing of earlier coronavirus vaccines, and that’s why we haven’t had coronavirus vaccines until this last year.

   The current crops of vaccines have been confirmed to provoke an immune response in humans. The question is, how often will the response be appropriate, and how often will it be in the regime of pathogenic priming? In other words, how many people will avoid the disease because they have been vaccinated, and how many will have a MORE SEVERE CASE because they’ve been vaccinated? The abbreviated vaccine trials were not designed to answer this question, but there are now millions of people who have been vaccinated, and it will be important to watch them and see.