As The US Suddenly Begins “Opening,” The WHOsters Presto The ‘Problem’ With PCR ‘Testing’! (VERMONT’S “GOLD STANDARD”)

Publisher’s Note: As if on cue, as the dust settles on APB’s January 20th DC “inauguration,” the “World Health Organization” (you know, the WHOsters who brought US the COVID-19 plandemic, widespread economic lockdowns, physical distancing, mandated mask wearing, experimental emergency gene therapy technologies dubbed “vaccines,” AND “gold standard” obligatory PCR testing for otherwise healthy humans) waved their magic wand and announced that – SURPRISE! – we’ve NOT been doing the PCR testing quite right these last eleven months. See Dr. David Samadi, below.

Meanwhile, newly elected APB POTUS (“Joe Biden,” that is) just publicly stated “There’s nothing we can do to change the trajectory of the pandemic in the next several months,” as US state and local officials scramble to OPEN their economies. All of a sudden.

Never a dull moment.

Thanks to Vermonter Pete Garritano for sending over this SENTINEL article which provides a detailed overview of the WHOster PCR wand waving.

No surprise to VI readers.

Remember, back in July 2020, the CDC urged governments to STOP testing healthy Humans for the virus. (Thanks to Vermont Aimee Stephenson for digging up the link courtesy the Wayback Machine.) Ultimately, the CCD reversed course. Wonder why?

Big Picture! It is VITAL to understand how “PCR testing” of healthy humans can be manipulated via varying the cycle thresholds to socially engineer and control US citizens via viral protocols, and ultimately, “manage” Human freedom of movement and association. For readers new to the conversation, we encourage you to review this HOW PCR TESTS WORK video here, and our ongoing reporting though the link above.

NOTE: Vermont COVID czar Mark Levine has stated publicly on many occasions that Vermont PCR testing labs run PCR testing cycle thresholds between 34 and 39 cycles.

PREDICTION: Vermont and US PCR test results will now be “massaged” downward via evolving “data” – “declining” COVID “cases” (which, BTW, do NOT equal “infections,” which do not equal “disease”) will be reported this way: Biden’s mask mandate and the “vaccines” are working!

Caveat Emptor. Free Vermont!

And here’s Children’s Health Defense with a deeper dive:

In an “inauguration” of its own while Joe Biden was being sworn into office, the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding the PCR assays used for testing for COVID.

Even though they’ve been widely used across the U.S. and around the world to determine who has a positive case of COVID, PCR assays are not designed to be used as diagnostic tools, as they can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and “live” or reproductive ones.

Besides that, previously, the WHO had recommended 45 “amplification” cycles of the test to determine whether someone was positive for COVID or not.

The thing is, the more cycles that a test goes through, the more likely that a false positive will come up — anything over 30 cycles actually magnifies the samples so much that even insignificant sequences of viral DNA end up being magnified to the point that the test reads positive even if your viral load is extremely low or the virus is inactive and poses no threat to you or anyone else.

What that means in plain language is that the more cycles a test goes through, the more false positives that are reported.

Now, with the WHO’s lower , it’s practically guaranteed that COVID “case” numbers will automatically drop dramatically around the world.

Here’s in-part what the WHO notice says:

Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.